The more teens can access accurate information from a abstinence only sex education effective in Mobile provider, the more prepared they can be when making decisions about their bodies and relationships. Byhalf of middle schools and more than three-quarters of high schools were focusing on abstinence.
Teen birth rates averaged Data on four possibly confounding factors were included in our analyses. According to the Guttmacher Institute, the national family planning program prevents 1. Ethnic composition For this analysis we focused on the three largest ethnic groups for which data are available: white, black, and Hispanic .
Journal of Health Communication. Publius: The Journal of Federalism. Email required. Religious doctrines take varying stances on contraception and pre-marital sex, some of which are covered by:. Follow Us.
As a result, these programs may actually be promoting irresponsible, high-risk teenage behavior by keeping teens uneducated with regard to reproductive knowledge and sound decision-making instead of giving them the tools to make educated decisions regarding their reproductive health .
AccessedFeb In81 percent of boys and 87 percent of girls reported learning of birth control in school. Liberals argue that failing to teach about it ensures more unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases.
Our analysis adds to the overwhelming evidence indicating that abstinence-only education does not reduce teen pregnancy rates. The study also found that youth that participated in the programs were no more likely to engage in unprotected sex than youth who did not participate.
National Vital Statistics Reports. As pointed out by the Society for Adolescent Medicine, the abstinence-only approach as stressed by level 3 state laws and policies and funded by the federal abstinence-only programs is characterized by the withholding of information and is ethically flawed .
Opponents and critics, which include prominent professional associations in the fields of medicine, public health, adolescent health, and psychology, argue that such programs fail to provide adequate information to protect the health of adolescents. PLoS One.